On the Fallacy of Morality & Virtue, Or On the Necessity of Vitality

What are your moral beliefs? Go ahead, try to answer...
If you took caution, or hesitated, you are on the right track. If you answered, this is not good, but it is correctable.

Let us begin this discussion of morality's lodging into the proverbial throats of our cognition. Morality can be defined as follows:

Morality
1 a: the peculiarity distinguishing the living from the nonliving b: capacity to live and develop; also : physical or mental vigor especially when highly developed
2 a: power of enduring b: lively and animated character

Shall we follow this definition?

Virtue
1 a: conformity to a standard of right : morality b: a particular moral excellence
2plural : an order of angels — see celestial hierarchy
3: a beneficial quality or power of a thing
4: manly strength or courage : valor
5: a commendable quality or trait : merit
6: a capacity to act : potency
7: chastity especially in a woman

So you see, the foundation of these two ridiculous concepts is on the intangible ground of right and wrong. Very relative, very wishy-washy. Very Rediculous. Right and wrong have been discussed for too long. Isn't it about time we divert our efforts to something more tangible?, more real?

Let me now define a more suitable alternative:

Vitality
1 a: the peculiarity distinguishing the living from the nonliving b: capacity to live and develop; also : physical or mental vigor especially when highly developed
2 a: power of enduring b: lively and animated character

Humans should no longer fret over right and wrong, but over living and non-living, physical and mental vigor, power of enduring, and lively-nes. "How right or wrong are my actions?" Please, that question is just plain ignoramous. How about questioning,
"How alive are you?"